
Scheme health check
Value for Member rules will require you to take a good look at what your scheme is offering, crunch some investment numbers and compare against three other similar pension schemes.
Evolve operates a Master Trust, Crystal, which has been subject to high-level regulation for a number of years now. Crystal has exceptional governance, administration and high performing investments so we have used those ingredients for you to assess against.
Our health check should take about 5 minutes to complete and leave you with an idea of how you might compare to some of the best schemes available to Members, whether it is a reassurance that your scheme is in great shape or motivates you to push to a higher level, we hope it helps as a first step.

Question 1:
Investments
Starting with investments. You will need to carry out some investment performance calculations but also consider the quality of the way you select and monitor the investment options you offer. Rate your scheme on your investment offering below. To help you gauge what we consider each rating to consist of we have put together a brief guide:
Basic:
Investments
You may offer a single default fund or a static lifestyle for Members with a range of self-select funds which have remained unchanged over the years.
You may review investment performance against expectations but typically take an Investment Consultants lead and tend not to look further than standard reports.
You have a few documents detailing the investment funds and aims and dedicate some meeting time to investment matters.
You have not yet considered ESG factors and could be finding it difficult to get information about charges and transaction costs. You also have not had the time to think through post-retirement options for Members.
Better:
Investments
You offer a default fund which you are comfortable matches what your Members need alongside a range of self-select funds which have different risk profiles.
You review investment performance against set risk and return objectives, challenge your investment consultant and occasionally ask for further information which leads to minor changes in the strategy.
You have several policies including timetables for reviewing your funds and regularly spend time at meetings talking through the investment funds, performance and risks.
You have started to consider the risks posed by ESG factors and can get detail regarding all charges and transaction costs. You have discussed post-retirement options for Members but have not put something in place.
Best:
Investments
You offer default fund(s) which matches the needs of your Members because you undertake regular Member analysis. The default(s) have clearly set out objectives and are dynamic in allowing risk control. You have a self-select range with clearly defined objectives and risk ratings.
You interrogate investment performance, risk and objectives, challenge advisors and have investment expertise within the trustees. You may have an investment committee that dedicates time to regularly reviewing the market for alternative thinking and strategies.
You have robust policies which are regularly reviewed, and stress-tested.
You have already embedded ESG considerations into your investment strategy and have detailed analysis of charges and transaction costs. You have assessed the need for post-retirement options and offer high-quality retirement options appropriate to your Members.

Question 2:
Governance
Considering how your scheme is looked after, and risks are controlled. Governance is a broad topic and we have considered each rating and shown a brief guide:
Basic:
Governance
You have trustees, the majority of whom are not pensions professionals but have undertaken some trustee and pension specific training.
Meetings take place regularly but you do not spend time assessing the effectiveness and skills of the trustees.
You have basic timetables, agendas and policies which the trustees review occasionally and a simple risk register that is updated when significant changes become apparent.
You have contracts in place with service providers and review them every few years.
You carry out the standard annual audit and consider anything in the audit findings report.
Better:
Governance
You have trustees who are selected in line with a robust policy including some professional trustees. The trustees have regular training on industry topics, and you keep a record for review.
You undertake a review of the skills of the trustees regularly including when new trustees are being appointed.
You have a triennial timetable, clear agendas and several policies which aid the management of meetings, conflicts and decision making. You have a detailed risk register which is reviewed annually or when changes are identified.
You have contracts in place with service providers and consider annually if they are performing appropriately alongside a comprehensive triennial review.
You carry out the standard annual audit with in-depth conversations about any findings and occasionally incorporate additional internal audits to ensure you are happy with the scheme operation.
Best:
Governance
You have highly skilled trustees who are selected in line with a robust policy with several professional trustees. The trustees have training and development targets which includes personal development of relevant skills and topics.
A comprehensive collective and individual competence review is undertaken regularly, and any appointments must demonstrate a high level of skills.
You have timetables, policies and documented processes which ensure consistent running of meetings, management of conflicts and decision making. You have a risk register where those factors identified as high risk are regularly discussed and mitigations proactively sought, the register is given regular meeting time to be discussed and is reviewed in its entirety annually.
You have contracts in place with service providers and relevant KPIs against which you measure the provider annually alongside a comprehensive triennial review.
You carry out a standard annual audit but have also put in place additional relevant audits to ensure excellent service quality and cyber security controls.

Question 3:
Administration
Thinking of how your scheme is administered and feedback is monitored, you will need to consider how your administrators provide information to the trustees, how they handle Member requests and how Members can access information amongst other things.
Basic:
Administration
You have a third-party administrator or have in-house administration capabilities which provides basic information at trustee meetings including performance against SLAs. You undertake a triennial review.
Your Members receive paper or email communications, can talk to an administrator on the phone and may have access to a website which shows them their current fund value.
Your administrator can demonstrate a basic level of control around data protection and keeps a log of complaints alongside the scheme's formal complaints procedure.
You can ask for a report detailing data quality which makes you comfortable that the record keeping is in order.
Better:
Administration
You have a third-party administrator or have in-house administration capabilities which provides detailed information at trustee meetings mainly centred around SLAs but includes some other statistics which you have requested. You undertake an annual review with the administrator and a more in-depth triennial review of the market.
Your Members receive mainly email communication but can elect to receive information by paper and have access to a helpline. You have a scheme Member website which allows Members to see their information and make basic changes/requests.
Your administrator has detailed data protection procedures and controls, all processes are documented and reviewed, and they have a good understanding of cyber security. There is a formal complaint procedure, but the administrator also seeks feedback and keeps logs of expressions of dissatisfaction in order to keep improving the service.
You can ask for a report detailing common and scheme specific data quality and the administrator tracks some other information such as turnaround times.
Best:
Administration
You have a detailed contract in place with a high-quality third-party administrator or have specialised in-house administration capabilities which provide comprehensive management reports regularly with attendance at trustee meetings to continually develop the service. You undertake an annual review against relevant KPIs and an in-depth triennial review of the market.
Your Members receive email communications but can elect to receive paper and have access to a dedicated helpline manned by skilled pensions professionals. You have a sophisticated, secure Member website allowing Members to self-serve including inbuilt education and interactive decision making.
Your administrator has comprehensive data protection and cyber security controls which are clearly documented, reviewed and stress tested which may include specific external auditing and penetration testing.
You regularly receive data quality and record keeping reports alongside in-depth assessment against industry best practice standards.

Question 4:
Communications
And finally, when it comes to communicating with your Members, which of our ratings best matches your current scheme.
Basic:
Communications
You operate a suite of letters which are reviewed occasionally and when legislation changes. You are comfortable that all the relevant regulatory information is included but this does mean some of the letters are long.
You take into consideration any feedback which arises through complaints but do not actively seek any other feedback.
You offer a basic Member website with scheme booklets, forms and some links to other sources of information.
Better:
Communications
You operate a suite of letters which are regularly reviewed and attempt to simplify the language to make it appropriate for your Members. You are comfortable that regulatory information is included, and have standardised the terminology to make it easier to understand the technical aspects.
You offer a feedback option for Members on your website and try to improve the service where you can.
You offer a Member website with all the relevant scheme information, forms and links to external sources of information with helpful guides on how to use the services available.
Best:
Communications
You operate a suite of consistently laid out communications which are appropriate to the method of communication. You have standardised all terminology and use simple language to communicate complex topics. You include a clear call to action and ways of enhancing Member decision making through online tools or telephone support.
You seek feedback at all engagement points and have a robust process for reviewing themes and specific requests. You collate and demonstrate how feedback from employers, Members and third-parties is considered.
You offer a sophisticated and engaging Member website with interactive assistance for better decision making. You utilise third-parties and additional services to ensure your Members understand pensions alongside their wider finances and can access the level of guidance and advice that is appropriate.

your results
Improvements needed
It looks like your scheme might need to consider a few improvements.
Basic | |
Better | |
Best | |
Investments |
Basic | |
Better | |
Best | |
Governance |
Basic | |
Better | |
Best | |
Administration |
Basic | |
Better | |
Best | |
Communications |
Based on the ratings you have given it looks like your scheme might need to consider a few improvements and should be aware that when comparing with other schemes you may need to show regulators how you will deliver those. You will need to assess your scheme against three other schemes so start gathering information which covers the categories above. You may need to explain why you chose those schemes so consider those with similar profiles, and do not forget you need one of those schemes to be able to offer you terms if you were to need to transfer your scheme.
If during the process you find that you have a number of improvements to make then you may need to create an action plan to show how you will take that next step or consider your options with other schemes.
Evolve have prepared a comparison pack for schemes, enter your email address below to and we will have it to you in 3 working days. If you would like us to provide terms in order that you can meet your Value for Member requirements or to consider consolidating your scheme with us please also supply the following details: